Skip to content

ducdetronquito/scalpl

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Β 

History

65 Commits
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 

Repository files navigation

image

Scalpl

image

image

image

image

Outline

  1. Overview
  2. Benefits
  3. Installation
  4. Usage
  5. Benchmark
  6. Frequently Asked Questions
  7. How to Contribute
  8. License

Overview

Scalpl provides a lightweight wrapper that helps you to operate on nested dictionaries seamlessly through the built-in dict API, by using dot-separated string keys.

It's not a drop-in replacement for your dictionnaries, just syntactic sugar to avoid this['annoying']['kind']['of']['things'] and prefer['a.different.approach'].

No conversion cost, a thin computation overhead: that's Scalpl in a nutshell.

Benefits

There are a lot of good libraries to operate on nested dictionaries, such as Addict or Box , but if you give Scalpl a try, you will find it:

  • πŸš€ Powerful as the standard dict API
  • ⚑ Lightweight
  • πŸ‘Œ Well tested

Installation

Scalpl is a Python3 library that you can install via pip

Usage

Scalpl provides a simple class named Cut that wraps around your dictionary and handles operations on nested dict and that can cut accross list item.

This wrapper strictly follows the standard dict API, which means you can operate seamlessly on dict, collections.defaultdict or collections.OrderedDict by using their methods with dot-separated keys.

Let's see what it looks like with an example ! πŸ‘‡

You can use the built-in dict API to access its values.

By default, Scalpl uses dot as a key separator, but you are free to use a different character that better suits your needs.

You can also easily create or update any key/value pair.

Following its purpose in the standard API, the setdefault method allows you to create any missing dictionary when you try to access a nested key.

And it is still possible to iterate over your data.

By the way, if you have to operate on a list of dictionaries, the Cut.all method is what you are looking for.

Also, you can remove a specific or an arbitrary key/value pair.

Because Scalpl is only a wrapper around your data, it means you can get it back at will without any conversion cost. If you use an external API that operates on dictionary, it will just work.

Finally, you can retrieve a shallow copy of the inner dictionary or remove all keys.

Benchmark

This humble benchmark is an attempt to give you an overview of the performance of Scalpl compared to Addict, Box and the built-in dict.

It will summarize the number of operations per second that each library is able to perform on a portion of the JSON dump of the Python subreddit main page.

You can run this benchmark on your machine with the following command:

python3 ./benchmarks/performance_comparison.py

Here are the results obtained on an Intel Core i5-7500U CPU (2.50GHz) with Python 3.6.4.

Addict 2.2.1:

instantiate:-------- 271,132  ops per second.
get:---------------- 276,090  ops per second.
get through list:--- 293,773  ops per second.
set:---------------- 300,324  ops per second.
set through list:--- 282,149  ops per second.

Box 3.4.2:

instantiate:--------- 4,093,439  ops per second.
get:-----------------   957,069  ops per second.
get through list:----   164,013  ops per second.
set:-----------------   900,466  ops per second.
set through list:----   165,522  ops per second.

Scalpl latest:

instantiate:-------- 183,879,865  ops per second.
get:----------------  14,941,355  ops per second.
get through list:---  14,175,349  ops per second.
set:----------------  11,320,968  ops per second.
set through list:---  11,956,001  ops per second.

dict:

instantiate:---------  37,816,714  ops per second.
get:-----------------  84,317,032  ops per second.
get through list:----  62,480,474  ops per second.
set:----------------- 146,484,375  ops per second.
set through list :--- 122,473,974  ops per second.

As a conclusion and despite being an order of magniture slower than the built-in dict, Scalpl is faster than Box and Addict by an order of magnitude for any operations. Besides, the gap increase in favor of Scalpl when wrapping large dictionaries.

Keeping in mind that this benchmark may vary depending on your use-case, it is very unlikely that Scalpl will become a bottleneck of your application.

Frequently Asked Questions:

  • What if my keys contain dots ?

    If your keys contain a lot of dots, you should use an other key separator when wrapping your data:

    proxy = Cut(data, sep='->')
    proxy['computer->network->127.0.0.1']

    Otherwise, split your key in two part:

    proxy = Cut(data)
    proxy['computer.network']['127.0.0.1']
  • What if my keys contain spaces ?:

    proxy = Cut(data)
    proxy['it works perfectly'] = 'fine'

How to Contribute

Contributions are welcomed and anyone can feel free to submit a patch, report a bug or ask for a feature. Please open an issue first in order to encourage and keep tracks of potential discussions ✍️

License

Scalpl is released into the Public Domain. πŸŽ‰

Ps: If we meet some day, and you think this small stuff worths it, you can give me a beer, a coffee or a high-five in return: I would be really happy to share a moment with you ! 🍻